| Texas | yes: 4 TAC 61.1 adopts the terms and definitions of the last published edition of the annual AAFCO Official Publication; no Official Publication of any year is in the snapshot 4 TAC §61.1 (Definitions), introductory paragraph | conditional: no fixed year is named; 4 TAC 61.1 adopts the last published edition of the annual AAFCO Official Publication, and no Official Publication is in the snapshot, so the operative edition cannot be read here | conditional: a dog or cat food prominently identified as a snack or treat on the principal display panel, as part of the designation required by 4 TAC 63.2(k), needs no statement of nutritional adequacy or purpose (4 TAC 63.2(o)); nothing else is waived, and feeding directions are in any case required only for a dog or cat food labeled complete and balanced (4 TAC 63.2(q)) 4 TAC §63.2(o) (Label Format and Labeling) |
|---|
| Florida | yes: the AAFCO Official Publication 2019 is incorporated by reference for ingredient names (5E-3.004(8)) and the Official Publication 2001 for minimum standards (5E-3.013); the AAFCO Model Pet Food Regulations are not adopted by name, and no Official Publication of either year is in the snapshot Fla. Admin. Code 5E-3.004(8) | yes: two fixed editions, Official Publication 2019 for ingredient names (5E-3.004(1) and (8)) and Official Publication 2001 for minimum standards (5E-3.013); neither publication is in the snapshot | none: no Florida label rule carves a treat out of any label item; the only treat exemptions in the chapter are from nutrient sampling and from mycotoxin sampling, which are compliance duties and not label items Fla. Admin. Code 5E-3.003(4)(b)1.d. |
|---|
| Ohio | yes: Ohio Admin. Code 901:5-7-01(A) adopts by reference chapters 4 to 6 of the AAFCO Official Publication (2024 edition) and the AAFCO Feed Inspector's Manual (2020 edition); neither document is in the snapshot Ohio Admin. Code 901:5-7-01(A) | yes: fixed editions, AAFCO Official Publication chapters 4 to 6 (2024 edition) and Feed Inspector's Manual (2020 edition); neither is in the snapshot | unknown: no treat carve-out appears in ORC 923.43 or in any of the seven rules of Ohio Admin. Code ch. 901:5-7; the model snack-or-treat carve-out from the nutritional adequacy statement that the other states in this block carry sits in the AAFCO Official Publication chapters 4 to 6 adopted by 901:5-7-01(A)(1), and that publication is not in the snapshot; separately, ODA guidance says chews, bones, toys, hooves, ears, animal bones, ligaments, snouts and pizzles are not covered by the law at all ODA "What to Look for on a Pet Food or Treat Label", Exemptions section, page dated March 09, 2026 (agency guidance, not law) |
|---|
| Illinois | yes: 505 ILCS 30/10(b) adopts the official definitions of feed ingredients and official feed terms as adopted and published by AAFCO, plus any amendments or supplements; no AAFCO Official Publication is in the snapshot 505 ILCS 30/10(b) (Rules and regulations) | conditional: no fixed year is named; Illinois adopts the AAFCO definitions as published plus any amendments or supplements, and no Official Publication is in the snapshot, so the operative edition cannot be read here | conditional: a dog or cat food prominently identified as a snack or treat, as part of the designation required on the principal display panel by 8 Ill. Adm. Code 200.130(k), needs no statement of nutritional adequacy (200.130(o)); nothing else is waived 8 Ill. Adm. Code 200.130(o) (Label Format and Labeling), Subpart B: Pet Food |
|---|
| Michigan | yes: R 285.635.1(2) adopts the AAFCO official definitions of feed ingredients and the official feed terms, and MCL 287.523(a) separately freezes the AAFCO official publication at the 2015 edition; no AAFCO Official Publication of any year is in the snapshot Mich. Admin. Code R 285.635.1(2) (Definitions and terms) | conditional: the act freezes the reference at the 2015 Official Publication (MCL 287.523(a)) while the 1979 rule text points instead to the current annual AAFCO publication (R 285.635.1(2)); the conflict is not resolved anywhere in the snapshot, and no Official Publication of either kind is in the snapshot | none: neither MCL 287.525 nor Regulation No. 635 carves a treat out of any label item, and Michigan requires no nutritional adequacy statement for a treat carve-out to attach to; MDARD guidance states only that treats require a guaranteed analysis and are not intended to be nutritionally complete MDARD Pet Food and Treats page, "What's the difference between pet treats and pet food?" |
|---|
| Iowa | yes: the rules adopt the AAFCO official definitions of feed ingredients and the AAFCO official feed terms, and ch. 42 relies on the AAFCO Dog or Cat Food Nutrient Profiles; no AAFCO Official Publication is in the snapshot Iowa Admin. Code 21.41.1(198), subrule 41.1(1) (Definitions and terms) | conditional: no AAFCO Official Publication year is named anywhere in the rules, so the reference is open-ended, and no Official Publication is in the snapshot, so the operative edition cannot be read here | conditional: a dog or cat food prominently identified as a snack or treat, as part of the designation required on the principal display panel by 21.42.2(10), needs no statement of nutritional adequacy or purpose (21.42.2(14)) and, not being labeled complete and balanced, owes no feeding directions either (21.42.2(16)); the guaranteed analysis, the ingredient statement, the quantity statement, the name and address, the species designation and the small-package registration all still apply Iowa Admin. Code 21.42.2(198), subrule 42.2(14) (Label format and labeling) |
|---|
| Missouri | yes: 2 CSR 70-30.010(1) adopts the AAFCO official definitions of feed ingredients and 2 CSR 70-30.015(1) adopts the annual AAFCO publication; no AAFCO Official Publication of any year is in the snapshot 2 CSR 70-30.010(1) (Definitions and Terms), first physical line of the three-column reprint | yes: two references, a fixed 1995 AAFCO Official Publication incorporated by reference into the pet food labeling rule (2 CSR 70-31.020) and a rolling annual AAFCO publication for feed terms (2 CSR 70-30.015); neither publication is in the snapshot | conditional: a dog or cat food prominently identified as a snack or treat, as part of the designation required on the principal display panel by 2 CSR 70-31.020(11), needs no AAFCO nutritional adequacy statement (2 CSR 70-31.020(15)) and, not being labeled complete and balanced, owes no feeding directions either (2 CSR 70-31.020(17)); separately, MDA treats rawhides and bones as outside the state labeling requirements altogether unless the label or advertising lists feed ingredients or claims nutritional value 2 CSR 70-31.020(15) (Pet Food Label Format and Labeling), first physical line of the three-column reprint |
|---|
| Indiana | yes: AAFCO ingredient names and definitions are mandatory on the label (IC 15-19-7-25.5(a)(3)) and the AAFCO Model Regulations for Pet Food and Specialty Pet Food, as published in the 2026 Official Publication, are the standard for a label review on request (IC 15-19-7-47(a)); no AAFCO Official Publication is in the snapshot IC 15-19-7-25.5(a)(3) (Ingredient statement) | yes: the 2026 Official Publication of AAFCO, for the model bill only; that publication is not in the snapshot | conditional: a dog or cat food clearly and conspicuously identified on the principal display panel as a snack or treat needs no statement of nutritional adequacy or purpose (IC 15-19-7-25.7(c)) and, not being labeled complete and balanced, owes no feeding directions either (IC 15-19-7-25.8(a)); nothing else is waived, and OISC requires the intended use, Treat, Snack or Supplement, on the front of the label IC 15-19-7-25.7(c) |
|---|
| California | no: California adopts no AAFCO document by statute or regulation; CDPH states only that it recognizes the AAFCO Official Publication as its reference for pet food ingredients not defined by California law, which is an agency statement and not an incorporation by reference CDPH, Procedures for Obtaining a Pet Food Processor License or Registration, Revised (8/2025), opening paragraph | none: no Official Publication year is named in the statute, in the rules or in any CDPH document; the CDPH sentence that names the publication names no edition | unknown: 17 CCR 19025 and Cal. Health & Safety Code Article 5 were both read in full and neither carves treats or snacks out of any label item, and California imposes no nutritional adequacy or complete and balanced statement for a treat carve-out to attach to; but the section that would carry exemptions, 17 CCR 19015 Exemptions, is not in the snapshot Cal. Health & Safety Code Sec. 113095 (Misbranding), the delegation of exemptions to department regulation |
|---|
| Georgia | yes: Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 40-5-1-.01(1) adopts the AAFCO Official Definitions of Feed Ingredients, and O.C.G.A. 2-13-12(b)(1) names the 1992 AAFCO official publication and supplements thereto; no AAFCO Official Publication of any year is in the snapshot Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 40-5-1-.01(1) | conditional: the statute fixes the 1992 AAFCO official publication and supplements thereto (O.C.G.A. 2-13-12(b)(1)) while the rules adopt the AAFCO definitions with no edition named (r. 40-5-1-.01(1)); no Official Publication of either kind is in the snapshot, so the operative edition cannot be read here | conditional: a dog or cat food prominently identified as a snack or treat, as part of the designation required on the principal display panel, needs no statement of nutritional adequacy (Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 40-5-8-.02(15)) and, not being labeled complete and balanced, owes no feeding directions by rule either (r. 40-5-8-.02(17)); the GDA brochure separately instructs treat makers to include feeding instructions, which is agency guidance rather than the rule Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 40-5-8-.02(15) |
|---|